This topic contains 4 replies, has 0 voices, and was last updated by GJones_Wine 6 years, 9 months ago.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 9, 2018 at 11:53 am #23767
Jeff StaffordIs it possible to have a custom item field with a formula that returns the unit price of a specific price level?
I've been able to accomplish the same result using a saved search using the following formula:
CASE {pricing.pricelevel} WHEN 'Special Clearance Price' THEN ABS({pricing.unitprice}) ELSE 0 END
The saved search method will not work for my task because I need two price levels (MSRP and Special Clearance Price) on a each result row. To accomplish this I group the items by their internal IDs. This means that all other fields in the results must also be calculations. Additional text fields are needed in the results and the formula text function has a limit of 1000 characters. Some of my text fields contain more than 1000 characters
This is a cached copy. Click here to see the original post. -
January 9, 2018 at 5:36 pm #23768
pcutlerYou can create a field with it's default value coming from a saved search instead of a formula. But I think you're going to run into challenges because fields that do not store values cannot be included in saved search results.
Jeff Stafford replied on 01/10/2018, 09:34 AM: Thanks a bunch pcutler, I appreciate your help. That’s where I was headed and you saved me some time.
-
January 17, 2018 at 1:05 pm #23769
GJones_WineIf you're looking to add different price levels for a single item to saved search results, this can be accomplished in a couple ways (that I know of…):
1. In an item saved search, add the results field "Other Prices." This way will show all other price levels for an item.
2. If you only want to see specific price levels per item, and not all of them, you can add a Formula (Currency) field to the results of an Item Saved Search. Make the formula {pricelevelX}, where X is the internal ID of the price level you want to see. Lastly, give the formula field a custom label. Repeat this for the price levels you'd want to see.
-
February 9, 2018 at 9:25 am #23770
Jeff StaffordThank you GJones_Wine. Your second solution worked for me. I apologize for the late response.
-
February 9, 2018 at 9:35 am #23771
GJones_WineOriginally posted by Jeff Stafford
View Post
Thank you GJones_Wine. Your second solution worked for me. I apologize for the late response.
Happy to hear it worked, Jeff!
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.